There are many people who are against making social nudism visible through images that illustrate it. That talking about nudism, should not carry implicit photographs about his practice.
And at all, when we are living in a moment when stripping naked in public and showing it uninujatingly through, for example, social media, is little less than "forbidden".
But what happens when a photographic artist wants to expose his work on nudity to make it known to his followers and is censored? Shouldn't I?
Or blogs and pro-nudist associations like ours, shouldn't we publicly exhibit photographs about our activities or actions?
We start from the premise that a naked body is neither evil nor necessarily sexual, nor something that should be treated socially in secret.
Because it is that thought that could lead us to accept with resignation the different types of censorship or the negative idea of which he believes that nipples, asses, or our sex organs should not be portrayed in public.
Showing us naked performing the various activities that we do we consider it more than necessary for people to empathize, know and understand that it is as respectable as the one that chooses to wear a swimsuit or a bikini and that they see that our naked body is a natural thing. That sexual connotations can only be in the eyes of the one who hopes to find them.
We will continue to graphically display the naturalness of what we do, circumventing censorship as we can and raising as many complaints about it as necessary, and appearing in the media when the time requires it. Because we nudists are neither a secret lodge nor an underground club.
In fact, more and more people decide to try nudism or return to it after years without. And, in part, it is also thanks to those who keep exposing their work and nudist journey so that everyone knows about it.
Strength, nudists! Don't hide your skin!
